Dynamics of postural control in Parkinson patients with and without symptoms of freezing of gait.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that dynamical measures such as sample entropy may be more appropriate than conventional measures when analyzing time series data such as postural sway. We evaluated conventional and dynamical measures of postural sway in Parkinson disease (PD) patients with and without freezing episodes. METHODS: COP (center of pressure) data were recorded during quiet standing with eyes open, eyes closed and while performing a dual task. Data for 16 patients with freezing of gait, 17 patients with no history of freezing and 24 healthy subjects were analyzed. The amount of postural sway was quantified using conventional measures, whereas for the characterization of the temporal structure of the COP data the normalized sway path and sample entropy was calculated. RESULTS: Mean radius was higher and sample entropy was lower in patients with freezing symptoms as compared to healthy subjects in all three conditions. Dual-tasking significantly increased sway path length in patients with freezing, while normalized sway path did not change over conditions in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that postural sway is characterized by a combination of large radius, short normalized sway path and high regularity of the COP only in patients with freezing. This pattern becomes most prominent in a dual-task paradigm. This may explain higher occurrence of gait freezing in dual task situations with subsequent higher risk of falls. Results suggested that dynamic measures may add valuable information for characterizing postural stability in PD patients.

Diagnosis and decision making for patients with disorders of consciousness: a survey among family members.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the perceptions of family members of patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) in regard to the patients' level of consciousness, communicative status, and prognosis as compared with the objective medical categories, and to elicit the family members' self-reported practice of treatment decision-making. DESIGN: Cross-sectional semiquantitative survey. SETTING: Five specialized neurologic rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of primary family members (N=44) of patients with DOC as determined by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, surveyed 6 months after the patient's brain injury. INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perception of level of consciousness as compared with the medical diagnosis; assessment of communicative status and prognosis; and practice of treatment decision-making. RESULTS: The study included 44 family members of patients, most of whom had sustained global cerebral ischemia. Six months after brain injury, 36% were in a vegetative state (VS), 20% were in a minimally conscious state (MCS), and 39% had emerged from an MCS. In 76% of cases, the relatives assumed the same level of consciousness that diagnostic tests showed. In the other cases, consciousness was mostly underestimated. While relatives of patients in a VS, and to a lesser extent of those in an MCS, were more skeptical about the patients' chances to advance to an independent life, all had high hopes that the patients would regain the ability to communicate. Yet, 59% of family members had thought about limiting life-sustaining treatment. Most of them base treatment decisions on the patient's well-being; very few relied on previously expressed patient wishes. CONCLUSIONS: According to our sample, family members of patients with DOC largely assess the level of consciousness correctly and express high hopes to reestablish communication with the patient.

Long-term health-related quality-of-life in patients with acquired brain injury and their caregivers.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to assess long-term health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and potential predictors as well as burden in caregivers of patients with acquired brain injury (ABI). Furthermore, depressive symptoms, well-being, HRQoL and happiness were evaluated in caregivers and patients who had regained communication skills. RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Data of 104 caregivers and 30 patients were analysed. A multiple linear regression model was calculated to identify independent predictors for HRQoL in caregivers. Additionally, correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate associations between patient questionnaire results and caregiver HRQoL. RESULTS: After a mean time post-injury of 18 years, HRQoL and perceived health status in caregivers remained below normative scores of age-matched controls. Although HRQoL and perceived health status were lower in patients than in caregivers, there was no difference in happiness, perceived QoL or enjoyment of life. Reduced perception in well-being (WHO-5 score < 13) was found in 52% of the caregivers and 36% of the patients. HRQoL in caregivers was predicted by well-being, caregiver strain, depressive symptoms and caregiver age. Furthermore, HRQoL of caregivers was correlated with depressive symptoms and happiness in patients. CONCLUSION: This study under-scores the importance of long-term support for caregivers.

Rehabilitation outcome of patients with severe and prolonged disorders of consciousness after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to evaluate rehabilitation outcome of aSAH survivors with severe disorders of consciousness (DOC) and to examine potential predictors of long-term outcome. Severe DOC includes patients in a vegetative state (VS) and in a minimally conscious state (MCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center cohort study of consecutive aSAH patients with severe and prolonged DOC upon admission to neurorehabilitation. Clinical assessments started right after discharge from ICU, a median of 26 days after the aSAH. Two different outcome criteria were used, one addressing the functional aspect (assessed by the Functional Independence Measure [FIM]) the other one addressing the level of consciousness ("behavioral outcome", assessed by the Coma Remission Scale [CRS]). Improved outcome was defined by an increase in FIM scores of at least 22 points (minimal clinically important difference) or by reaching a full score of 24 points on the CRS. Separate least square linear regression models were calculated to examine potential predictors for functional and behavioral outcome. RESULTS: Out of 63 patients, 19.0% and 39.7% of the patients achieved an improved functional and behavioral outcome, respectively. Age and level of consciousness upon admission to neurorehabilitation were independent prognostic factors for both outcome definitions. Both groups reached the better outcome category after a median of 11 and 9 weeks, respectively. In an individual patient, the longest delay to achievement of improved functional outcome was 30 weeks and to favorable behavioral outcome was 22 weeks after rehabilitation admission. CONCLUSION: About one-third of severely affected aSAH patients with DOC regained at least a favorable behavioral status during early neurorehabilitation. It is interesting to note that in our study population, the beginning of clinical improvement took up to 6 months after aSAH.

Rehabilitation outcome of anoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy survivors with prolonged disorders of consciousness.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the natural clinical course of patients admitted to inpatient neurorehabilitation in a coma, vegetative state (VS), or minimally conscious state (MCS) after anoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (AIE). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 113 consecutive patients admitted to a German inpatient neurorehabilitation centre with severe disorders of consciousness (DOC) following AIE due to cardiac arrest over a 6-year period. Functional independence was measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and recovery of consciousness with the Coma Remission Scale (CRS). Separate binary logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors for functional and behavioural outcomes. RESULTS: Seven patients (6.2%) achieved a good functional outcome (GOS 4-5). Five of these showed significant functional improvement within the first 8 weeks. 22 patients (19.5%) recovered consciousness; the last patient began to make significant improvement between weeks 10 and 12. Logistic regression showed that both increasing age and lower admission CRS predicted unfavourable functional outcome and persistent DOC. A longer stay in the ICU also predicted persistent DOC at the end of neurorehabilitation. However, neither malignant somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) test results nor hypothermia treatment on the ICU were outcome predictors in either outcome category. CONCLUSION: Even among severely affected AIE patients arriving at a neurological rehabilitation centre in a DOC, there remains potential for functional and behavioural improvement. However, significant improvements may not begin for up to 3 months post-injury. This study suggests that recovery of consciousness and even a good neurological outcome are possible despite malignant SEP test results.

Rationale and design of the prospective German registry of outcome in patients with severe disorders of consciousness after acute brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the rationale and design of a new patient registry (Koma Outcome von Patienten der Frührehabilitation-Register [KOPF-R; Registry for Coma Outcome in Patients Undergoing Acute Rehabilitation]) that has the scope to examine determinants of long-term outcome and functioning of patients with severe disorders of consciousness (DOC). DESIGN: Prospective multicenter neurologic rehabilitation registry. SETTING: Five specialized neurologic rehabilitation facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=42) with DOC in vegetative state or minimally conscious state (MCS) as defined by the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) after brain injury. Patients are being continuously enrolled. The data presented here cover the enrollment period from August 2011 to January 2012. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CRS-R, FIM, and emergence from MCS. RESULTS: The registry was set up in 5 facilities across the state of Bavaria/Germany with a special expertise in the rehabilitation of acquired brain injury. Inclusion of patients started in August 2011. Measures include sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, course of acute therapy, electrophysiologic measures (evoked potentials, electroencephalogram), neuron-specific enolase, current medication, functioning, cognition, participation, quality of life, quantity and characteristics of rehabilitation therapy, caregiver burden, and attitudes toward end-of-life decisions. Main diagnoses were traumatic brain injury (24%), intracerebral or subarachnoid hemorrhage (31%), and anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (45%). Mean CRS-R score ± SD at admission to rehabilitation was 5.9 ± 3.3, and mean FIM score ± SD at admission was 18 ± 0.4. CONCLUSIONS: The KOPF-R aspires to contribute prospective data on prognosis in severe DOC.

Rehabilitation outcome of unconscious traumatic brain injury patients.

Outcome prediction of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with severe disorders of consciousness (DOC) at the end of their time in an intensive care setting is important for clinical decision making and counseling of relatives, and constitutes a major challenge. Even the question of what constitutes an improved outcome is controversially discussed. We have conducted a retrospective cohort study for the rehabilitation dynamics and outcome of TBI patients with DOC. Out of 188 patients, 37.2% emerged from a minimally conscious state (MCS) and 16.5% achieved at least partial functional independence after a mean observation period of 107 days (range 1-399 days). This reflects that emergence from MCS is much easier to achieve than functional independence. Logistic regression analysis identified age and level of consciousness upon admission to neurorehabilitation as independent prognostic factors for both outcomes. The group who reached at least partial functional independence started to improve significantly more than the corresponding outcome group by post-injury week 7, and the average time to reach this functional status was 18 weeks. In contrast, the group who emerged from MCS started to improve after 6 weeks. The longest delay between brain injury and the beginning of functional improvement (measured by biweekly Functional Independence Measure [FIM] scores) still compatible with reaching at least partial functional independence was 18 weeks. In conclusion, despite a strong negative selection, a substantial proportion of severe TBI patients with DOC achieve functional improvements or at least emerge from MCS within the inpatient rehabilitation phase. In order to avoid self-fulfilling prophecies in decision making, it is important to be aware of the fact that the beginning of clinical improvement may take several months after brain injury. In this study, separation of both of the functional outcome groups started by 7 weeks post-injury.